Thread: Why "Groupset"?
View Single Post
Old 07-04-24 | 09:05 AM
  #170  
genejockey's Avatar
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23,576
Likes: 17,049
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Originally Posted by Camilo
"tubs" referring to tubular tires. I guess because "tubes", which would be a better shortening of the word, is already taken by a tire/wheel part.

"Sewups" for chrissakes.

Agree: ban "steed" or "stable" forever. Bike forums should replace any use of that word with *****. Or, for goodness sakes "quiver"???
"Quiver" is a silly name for the group of bikes one owns and rides. If you've shot bow'n'arras much, you know that the vast majority of archers want every arrow in their quiver to be as much like all the others as possible, because consistency is the basis of accuracy. With bikes, if you own a number of bikes, usually no two are alike. You bought each one for its own unique properties that set it apart from the others. "Stable" conveys that idea - horses are individuals, so it's not a bunch of identical things, so "stable" is okay by me. I've used it occasionally. But "steed"? That's a bit pretentious, somehow, IMO.

WRT tires, I agree that "tubs" is not, at least in speech, an abbreviation of "tubulars", and "sew-ups" is far more specifically descriptive. Up till tubeless was invented, all tires had tubes, so "tubular" could describe all of them, but "sew-up" clearly distinguishes one type. I suppose you could also call them "stick-ons", but that doesn't sound as good as "sew-up".
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles

Last edited by genejockey; 07-04-24 at 03:09 PM.
genejockey is offline  
Reply