Old 08-13-24 | 04:50 PM
  #12  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,864
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Ron Damon
That's not a very tall or protruding seat tube.
Height doesn't matter. It's about bending moments and the location of the fulcrum.

Imagine inserting a strong but flexy rod into the frame and pulling it back the way a post would be under load. Would the rod flex ONLY above where it exits the tube? Or, would it tend to pull the tube back with it?

Repeat this countless times to imagine how the design combined with in sufficiently an rigid post would cause a fatigue failure.

You can also search "aluminum edge crack formation" or a similar phrase to learn why aluminum frames are especially likely to fail this way.

FWIW a taller extension might do better because the slot and drilled hole would be farther from the most stressed area.

Flex is the issue, and eliminating it is the solution.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply