View Single Post
Old 09-04-24 | 08:53 PM
  #13  
GCBM's Avatar
GCBM
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 470
Likes: 668
From: High Desert above L.A.

Bikes: Primary bike in 2025 - my 1979/80 Shogun 600 since I can change everything and not feel like I'm committing sacrilege; followed by 71 Hetchins Hellenic, 72 Hetchins straight stay Spyder, late 70's gold ALAN Competition with Campy/Huret Jubilee

Originally Posted by Kilroy1988
Why is that a concern, exactly? I thought the issue was the fact that the NDS cup wasn't threaded in as much as usual, which the spindle being made for a 70mm bottom bracket would explain.

The space you'll have between the NDS crank arm and the cup looks perfectly normal to me but you haven't shown what it looks like with the crank arm on so that's only a hunch. In my experience after the crank arm is pressed on there's typically only 2-3mm between the cup and arm. Obviously a lot more space is required on the drive side but unless if you have super flared chain stays it shouldn't be an issue on the NDS.
I was only addressing the concept of a potential complication if this was a 70mm shell, and even then - just potential, because the angle of the seat stay emerging from shell would change as well. But my original question related to whether I was simply using this spindle with cups that were too thick. Thinner cups would give better extension beyond the face, and the thought came up because I'm used to seeing the following spacing on the NDS side...


a bit more space from the face to the beginning of the taper. But yes, I have seen less as well...
GCBM is offline  
Reply