Old 09-18-24 | 12:21 PM
  #29  
Reynolds's Avatar
Reynolds
Passista
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 1,194

Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaņa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility

Originally Posted by 79pmooney
I keep having this thought - if half the energy put into 1Xs was applied to triples, we could have some really sweet systems. High top end, low bottom end. Tight gear jumps all the way through. Sweet shifting, front and rear. Enough overlap of ratios that we get to shift in front when we want, not because we ran out of gears. How 'bout a:

50-38-24 X 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25-28-32. 123" to 20". Biggest jump 13%.

Big ring usable cogs - 123" to 54". Middle ring - 86" to 37". Inner ring - 50" to 20"

What's not to like? With clutched RDs and chain catchers and again, half the attention 1X is getting, shifting reliability on rough stuff like gravel should be excellent. And this can all be done on a 110-74 crankset with it's multitude of available chainrings.
Totally agree with this. As for me, 50/11 would be too much, 50 or even 48/12 might be enough.
Reynolds is offline  
Reply