Originally Posted by
RChung
I have a PhD and I'm pretty damn unsure about most of the stuff I've done. I don't pay much attention to doctorates as a qualifying attribute.
Decades ago when I was still a grad student, I asked the then-chair of our department, a pretty well-known guy and a member of the NAS, about a long-running academic dispute he had with another professor on campus, of equal reknown and also a member of the NAS. He thought for a moment, then lowered his voice and leaned in. "Robert," said he, "you can lead a horse's ass to water but you can't make him think."
Sure, half of all PhDs are below average, and some are flat-out wrong at times. But, as a group, people with PhDs in physics and engineering are
much more qualified to analyze this theory than people with PhDs in totally unrelated fields.