Originally Posted by
Polaris OBark
You cannot prove anything in science. (There is no law of induction that enables you to prove anything from a finite number of observations.) You can only refute, by demonstrating a counter-example. It isn't a bias. It is the only way forward.
It isn't my idea, either. cf:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_P...m_of_induction
I didn't mean that. I meant that science should test things without the bias of trying to discredit an idea because you don't like it.