View Single Post
Old 01-23-25 | 11:58 PM
  #32  
bikingshearer's Avatar
bikingshearer
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,716
Likes: 4,344
From: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

I'll add my agreement that wheels matter for us big people. As I said above, I'm 6'3" and 255 lbs. Everything I own and ride is old lugged steel, ranging in age from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s. I have zero worries about the frames. But I also insist on wheels with 32 or 36 spokes. I simply do not do minimally-spoked wheels.

With 32 or 36 spokes, if a spoke breaks. I can make it home, maybe without even having to open the brake calipers. (I know because I've done it, although it has been quite a few years since I busted a spoke.) However, with a low-spoke count wheel, each spoke is under much higher tension and thus the wheel will deflect much more if a spoke goes, and you will either have to do a serious roadside truing job or call for someone to come get you in a car. (I know because I've seen it happen and have done emergency true jobs on such wheels in the middle of a ride.)

I also now ride 32mm tires on all ,y bikes on whoch they will fit, not for weight-nearing reasons, but because they are more comfortable.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Reply