Originally Posted by
noglider
Not listed on {RWGPS}'s chart is the ability to distinguish rides by the bike I use. I want to know what I was riding when I read the record. That might have been the feature that convinced me to pay.
A friend of mine has the premium plan which is $80/year. I don't remember why, but he's glad he has it. He recently crossed the country on his bike, so he probably used some of the extra features.
Originally Posted by
prj71
Garmin Connect and Strava both do that....For FREE.
Good to know. I think there are some features of RWGPS that Strava lacks which helped me decide. I think the statistics are more extensive, but I could be wrong.
This discussion has veered or evolved into one about which ride logging service we like best. I don't mind if others don't. I'm still happy with my decision, and I'm not likely to change it soon, though I might change one day.