Old 04-08-25 | 02:47 PM
  #21  
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
icemilkcoffee
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 3,701
The sample size 1300 cyclists (and 69,000 non cyclists) is not that small. If you look at all-cause mortality, you can see that entire 95% confidence interval lies well to the left of the control group median. There is a ~5% chance that the protective effect is anything less than 25%.
With a larger sample of cyclists, the exact amount of protection may vary by a few percentage point and the confidence interval would be narrower, but the overall protective effect of cycling, is clearly demonstrated here.

Last edited by icemilkcoffee; 04-08-25 at 02:50 PM.
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Reply