Old 04-09-25 | 09:37 AM
  #28  
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,667
Likes: 1,982
From: Burlington Iowa

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Originally Posted by acidfast7_2
been bust trying to motivate PhDs/MRes students to generate data in the lab today and to write a paper.

had a Quick Look on how the categories were decided and it seems to be the Scottish Census from 2001 and 2011.

the question and the data tabulation is below (so that's the basis for the categorisation of our study participants for pedestrians and cyclists). I am unsure what is non-active (all others????)


Interesting. From this info, I would assume that the typical BF "enthusiast" who rides a bicycle for recreational, competition, fitness, trail riding, group rides, etc., but not commuting purposes fits into the non-active (other) category.
The unanswered question arises then what is so special about bike commuting and by what mechanism it allegedly reduces the risks of diseases such as cancer and does it apply to all other types of "active" bicycling?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Reply