View Single Post
Old 05-06-25 | 11:28 AM
  #3  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,234
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

The data, I’ve seen is that the aero savings is between 0.5 and 0.9 watts.

ENVE says they use recessed nipples because it alllows them to design rims where the spoke holes are molded not drilled, and that their design puts less stress on the rim and the spoke for a stronger wheel.

The watt saving is truly deminimis. The alleged strength advantage in my experience is a non issue. I’ve never had a problem with rims cracking or spokes breaking on comparable wheels, such as Zipp that do not use recessed nipples. Also I don’t see why you can’t mold spoke holes and still use conventional nipples.

For me, the theoretical advantages of recessed nipples are imperceptible, while the hassles are very real
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply