View Single Post
Old 05-08-25 | 02:46 PM
  #53  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,115
Likes: 6,327
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Aubergine
I do get that, I think. I was just thinking that it must be possible to design for a certain amount of flexibility, given the constraints of the material's strength. But although I loved science courses in college, i never did anything in the fields of engineering or material sciences.
Yes, I'm sure bike makers design a bit of flex into forks. To get extra flexibility, they use thinner walls or perhaps smaller diameters. And to do that, they'll need a stronger alloy. So it's a tradeoff between flexibility and cost. They have to meet a minimum strength standard, and I gather the regulations require higher strength than before. I'm under the impression that current-production steel forks are heavier than they were back in the day. I've kept bike shops in business since 1975, not long before you.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply