Originally Posted by
Kilroy1988
I didn't misread anything. I immediately correctly read Steve's post as sarcasm, which he stated it was in a post that he made a matter of seconds before mine went through (I did not see his post yet when I began my reply) and then instead of acknowledging the sarcasm you kept laying it on by quoting St. Sheldon. Based on the general flavor of so many of your posts here, where you interject in such a way that you clearly just want to prove people wrong for the sake of doing so, there really shouldn't be any limit to how often you get a taste of your own medicine. Good day.
Sure you did. My post was in reference to the fact that Steve's joke (which I realized was a joke), didn't quite work because "front fork" and "rear fork" are actual bike terms - as Steve confirms he was not aware of.
But you seem confused that I didn't know that Steve made a joke. But I did, so that was your first mistake. Your second mistake was to act like I was insulting you for pointing out that you were missing my point. Which is strange that you got offended, since you had just posted to make sure I was aware that you thought I missed the point.
Whatever "good" you think you're doing by calling me out, you're just highlighting that you are the confused one and that you have some sort of emotional investment in showing me up. While all I was doing was letting Steve know about a cycling term he probably wasn't aware of. And I did so politely.
So you can go bother someone else, now.