View Single Post
Old 07-12-25 | 06:04 AM
  #12  
SJX426's Avatar
SJX426
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,757
From: Fredericksburg, Va

Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster

I am not a frame builder but if given an opportunity I would like to try it out.
Anyway, I have "corrected' a couple with help from this group and greatly appreciate the responses and feedback.
In January, while looking through Market Place, a Litespeed Catalyst showed up at a very good price, more than half what a complete bike comparably outfitted is being asked on the bay. I know that alignment is key in the build of the frame with no chance of post build alignment with significant investment. This thing was like I had ridden it all my life, hands free on the first ride with impeccable alignment in that position. I reflect @sdodd comment above.
The Montello rear triangle is off by about 2 mm to the drive side. I haven't done anything about it as the rear wheel is dished to compensate. I am now thinking it is past time to overhaul and address the issue along with the finish in a minor way. Besides, the Montello and Catalyst both are 3x9 Racing T with the difference of clinchers vs tubulars (Montello). Might be even a nicer ride though both have Vittoria G+ tires.
What encourages me to do so is the alignment I did to another frame that was a bit more out of alignment without any consequences.

Bottom line is this thread discussion of ride quality was inspiring, thanks!
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
SJX426 is offline  
Reply