View Single Post
Old 07-23-25 | 12:15 PM
  #19  
bfuser5893539
Guest
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 1,442
Originally Posted by john m flores
I just looked at my data on this same descent from 2014 on what I think was my 650c Serotta - max speed 40.5mph (65.2kph). So ~1.7mph faster on a bigger-wheeled bike.

This confirms what I've been thinking, smaller-wheeled bikes don't descend as quickly. Is the reduced rotational inertia? Or something with the aerodynamics of smaller wheels spinning faster? Frictional losses in the faster-spinning bearings?
I've only recently learned that smaller wheels and tires are less efficient overall even with the aerodynamic bonus.

I think it's due to the contact patch.
The smaller the diameter, the shorter distance the contact pressure increases over a specific distance.
(Smaller tire, less eccentric the oval shaped contact patch)
((so the tire has to deform more going from more round to contacting flat))

I think, with a skinny enough tire and high enough pressure, the deforming loss no longer negates the mass and aerodynamic advantages.

Then the ride would suuuuuuuuuuuuck.
bfuser5893539 is offline  
Reply