View Single Post
Old 09-02-25 | 09:09 AM
  #10  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,172
Likes: 6,404
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

I agree that dynamo hubs are MUCH preferable over bottle dynamos. The one exception might be where you install it with the idea that you will rarely use it. The advantages of bottle dynamos are light weight and easy installation.

It is definitely more work or money to install a hub dynamo but there's a good chance that once you get it, you'll wonder why you waited so long. That has been my experience. It weighs a bit more, and some object to that, but if weight is objectionable because it makes riding harder, that's misguided, because the bottle dynamo adds much more effort. I leave my lights on all the time because I don't perceive the drag that my hub dynamo introduces. It's there, and it's measurable, but I don't perceive it, and that's what matters to me. And having my lights on in the day might enhance my safety. I suspect it helps people see me sooner and respond to my presence and trajectory, and I believe I have seen this happen.

Whatever dynamo you use, be sure to use modern lights. They use less electrical energy, and they emit much more light than old lights. I have run modern lights with old bottle dynamos, and other than the expected drag and noise, the setup worked perfectly well.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply