View Single Post
Old 09-25-25 | 02:21 PM
  #40  
steve21108's Avatar
steve21108
Newbie
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 38
Likes: 31
From: Millersville, MD

Bikes: Dunelt 3 Spd (hub date 1964); 2 Raleigh (early 70s) Grand Prix converted to SA AW; 76 Raleigh Rampar converted to SA AW; Raleigh Super Course fixed; Raysport; 2003 Trek XO1; Jamis Aurora; Jamis Expat; Bianchi Posts (S3X); 1985 Ross Mt Hood; Univega;

Originally Posted by Trakhak
That statement is off-topic, of course, but: the "Not For Identification" wording was more likely a legal disclaimer intended to absolve the Federal government of responsibility if you found yourself defrauded as a result of providing your SSN to a crook as a means of identification.

The disclaimer was removed from the card (in 1972, I just read; it had first appeared there in 1946) because an overwhelming number of non-governmental businesses and agencies had come to use it as a de facto means of identification over the years.
This was the engraver we used in the shop I worked in. Early 70s. Park stand, Suntour two prong removers (many), etc were taken before the Sheriff came. Partners got into a dispute. Rent was not paid. Left us teenagers to run the shop.  Wish i could have scored a Gitane TDF instead.
This was the engraver we used in the shop I worked in. Early 70s. Park stand, Suntour two prong removers (many), etc were taken before the Sheriff came. Partners got into a dispute. Rent was not paid. Left us teenagers to run the shop. Wish i could have scored a Gitane TDF instead.

steve21108 is offline  
Reply