Originally Posted by
Kontact
Which part of it is dishonest? The OP has two identical brand new helmets that Bell says are good. He returns one of them and let's the retailer know that it seems defective. They do what Bell won't do and send it back to Bell for credit. Just using two different sales channels back to Bell.
Bell is the one being dishonest, you realize.
I still believe two wrongs don't make a right.
And it hasn't been established that the OP is actually dealing with Bell. Some of what was written sounded like it could be just a vendor that sold Bell helmets. And the crash replacement policy says to go through Bell. Not the vendor.