View Single Post
Old 09-30-25 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
veganbikes
Clark W. Griswold
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,226
Likes: 6,611
From: ,location, location

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Originally Posted by Jax Rhapsody
Because I like how they look. I already have three ashtabula bmx sets, two of which are going on cruisers. I don't see a reason not to do it, unless I can't find the chainring size I want, people use bmx parts on not bmx bikes pretty often.
Ashtabula doesn't belong anywhere except the annals of history. Maybe a good idea back in the day before they figured out square taper/splined and then external bottom brackets but I wouldn't waste the time and money trying to adapt an outdated standard to a modern bike. There are some conversions from Ashtabula to English threading but I have not really seen one to go backwards because you cannot do so in an English threaded bottom bracket and nobody would buy a T47 bottom bracket shelled bike to put some outdated cranks on.

Plus Ashtabula would not be very sturdy or strong for mountain biking hence why you don't ever see a real mountain bike with them. Certainly wally-mart specials that say not for "off-road usage" but there is a reason for that.
veganbikes is online now  
Reply