View Single Post
Old 11-24-25 | 03:39 PM
  #17  
maddog34's Avatar
maddog34
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,326
Likes: 3,195
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by veganbikes
Who is upselling? I sold nothing I suggested keeping the same brakes and saving up money there was no sale transacted or pushing for a particular product or anything like that. I also said nothing snobbish just truth about the bike. It has a cheap coil fork and cheap parts on it not designed around mountain biking that is not snobbery just facts about the parts. Also facts that a rim brake won't work on a bike like that.

The only thing one needs to do is just replace the broken parts and move forward. The alternatives are expensive or worse than the MT200s so why would anyone suggest something different than just fixing what is broken or getting a replacement set of MT-200s? That seems silly and counter-productive.
uuummmmmmm, when did Shimano MT200s enter the thread?
the Trek Marlin uses Tektro brakes.

i've tuned many Marlins, both Gary Fishers and Treks... fun bikes, every one of them.

i won't comment on your known snobbery.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply