View Single Post
Old 12-11-25 | 02:11 PM
  #23  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,123
Likes: 6,340
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
We are entering a weird era where it's going to be cheaper and easier to put a wireless chip inside the light, than a physical switch that's exposed to the elements and wears out. Better get used to it
My spouse bought a Tesla car 2-1/2 years ago, and many of the car's functions are accessed from the big touch screen. It's so stupid, and I think it's dangerous and should be illegal. You can use your vision -- even your peripheral vision -- to locate a knob or button, and you can push it or turn it without looking. To use onscreen controls, you need to watch your finger, as there is no tactile feedback. I believe Tesla is not the only maker going this way. They save money this way. They might claim higher reliability because knobs and switches wear out. There is more versatility because an area of the screen is used for different functions at different times. But for a car, this is terrible in my view.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply