Old 01-03-26 | 07:34 AM
  #54  
Trakhak's Avatar
Trakhak
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,011
Likes: 5,911
From: Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by 50PlusCycling
The main thing I have against suspension stems is that they don’t absorb hits or shocks to the bike. They protect your hands and upper body from hits and shocks, but do nothing at all to absorb those felt by the bike. I occasionally ride over very rough surfaces, enough that things which aren’t secured tightly to my bike, or even in my jersey pockets, can fall off. I’ve had to go back and look for my phone twice when it bounced out of my jersey pocket (I now keep it mounted to the stem with a Rec Mount). I find comfort over the rougher places I ride to be more important than all-out speed.
I wouldn't want to assume blithely that fork suspension would be significantly better at keeping loosely mounted items on the bike from falling off.

There are phone cases with clips. Having lost a phone on a ride, I now use a case that uses a strong spring clip that secures to my jersey pocket.

__________________
You are always the same age inside.---Gertrude Stein

My aluminum bikes: Light, strong, cheap, and comfy.
Trakhak is offline  
Reply