these two are the better bikes...
https://www.yobicycle.com/hybrid/sch...ss-50152/specs
the crisscross has n=maintained price well, and is a fine bike deserving of better parts being added .
the crisscross has an almost cult-like fan club....

https://www.yobicycle.com/mountain-b...isc-4790/specs
the 3700 is a nice bike, light aluminum frame, modern handling, and also responds well to upgrades... stock, the drivetrain is not high quality, but can be upgraded easily... the fork is heavy, but functions ok.. etc.

the crossfit is heavy and has all low end parts... not a fav of most folks..

the ariel is ok, more modern, but not holding value.. it is targeted at women and will have a shorter reach and some heavy parts, being a low end offering..

the GT outpost is a 26" wheeled MTB, and geared for offroad-ish riding... it won't handle big jumps or thrashing thru the rock gardens, but is fine for gravel roads and an occasional muddy trail.
they respond well to upgrades like a better fork and derailleurs... i've rescued a few of them over the years.

the Trek is the best one to invest money into (Disc Brakes help sell bikes, Period.)... the Schwinn Crisscross is the coolest one... the GT is not a bad choice, either.... i'd shy away from the other two unless they fit you really well, frame size-wise, and the other three don't.
Suspension forks are only good to have if you hammer offroad fairly frequently... the add weight and cheapo suspension is always on the heavier side... 5 lbs. compared to 2lbs for a rigid fork... suspension also eats your pedaling power, especilally cheap forks with no lockout feature.

your riding style is the determining factor... easy trails and road? the crisscross or trek... more offroad/gravel/hills/mud? the gt....

it all comes down to the fit.
and pictures of the bikes always help us immensely. A good Right side pic, derailleurs and gears, and the view you have of the cockpit.