View Single Post
Old 02-09-26 | 08:37 AM
  #150  
bblair
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 729
From: Columbus, Ohio

Bikes: Lynskey R230, Trek 5200, 1975 Raleigh Pro, 1973 Falcon ,Trek T50 Tandem and a 1968 Paramount in progress.

Originally Posted by terrymorse
No, it's for trained endurance athletes who can be considered both "fat adapted" and "carb adapted".
Q: can a person actually become "adapted" or is this simply physiology?
Q2: Would not an athlete who is termed "adapted" also be a fitter person, thus being stronger, faster, etc.?
Q3: Bonus question. If I am both fat and carb "adapted" before that was what, protein adapted? That is all that is left.

OK, one more. According to my recent VO2 Max test, I switch from burning fat to carbs around 85% of my max HR. So, right around there is where I should train, right? According to the analysis that I was given, that is Zone 2, but in all honest, that is too high for me to sustain over a long period.

Edit: that Z2 was from my actual test. RWGPS calculates that as a Zone 4 HR, which fits better with my perceived rate of exertion or whatever that is called.

Last edited by bblair; 02-09-26 at 08:52 AM. Reason: clarification
bblair is offline  
Reply