View Single Post
Old 02-10-26 | 03:41 PM
  #175  
bblair
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 729
From: Columbus, Ohio

Bikes: Lynskey R230, Trek 5200, 1975 Raleigh Pro, 1973 Falcon ,Trek T50 Tandem and a 1968 Paramount in progress.

Originally Posted by TerrenceM
Just gonna throw this out there... calmly roll a genade into the room 😂

Half of biomedical research studies don’t stand up to scrutiny – and what we need to do about that
I know that there is a push by some organizations to put some light on this, but can't remember the name. For example, there are never negative studies published.

Compounding the problem is that the popular press sees these "studies"/press releases and publishes them with headlines, "New studies show....."
For example, the conventional wisdom, for whatever that is worth (zero) is that caffeine is an aggrevating factor in dementia and Alzheimers. Yesterday I saw a headline, "studies show..." and it was the exact opposite.

I am no where near an expert, but have read a lot of studies through the years (retired dentist) to know how to read the lit. The average schmo has no frikkin idea and the "journalists" who report it are even worse.
bblair is offline  
Reply