View Single Post
Old 04-03-26 | 06:56 PM
  #19  
genejockey's Avatar
genejockey
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 23,552
Likes: 17,031
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Originally Posted by Andy_K
I wouldn't say older road bikes are setup for flat riding. It's more that back in the day, riders didn't know better so they mashed up hill with high gearing. Now we like to call that heroic.

Modern bikes that sane people consider geared for hills typically use a compact double (50-34 or similar). Personally, I hate compact doubles with a passion. I feel like I'm always in the wrong gear. I've come to appreciate sub-compact doubles (42-30 or so), but I really love triples. The thing I like about triples is that for the majority of the ride it's basically geared like a 50-39 double (or 53-39 in some cases), but when you hit a hill, you've got that really low granny gear in your back pocket.
50/34, I somewhat concut. It seems like at cruising speeds on lightly rolling terrain, I'm either crosschaining in either chainring. I never get that with 53/39. With 52/36, I'll find myself hardly shifting the front at all, even when it would be better.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is offline  
Reply