Old 04-21-26 | 02:48 AM
  #12261  
Trakhak's Avatar
Trakhak
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 6,058
From: Baltimore, MD
Originally Posted by Robvolz
I stand corrected. I made that mistake because I worked at a shop when a Bridgestone model featured it as stock and no one else had. I must have overheard it and took it for Grant gospel.

Here is a neat link to some good customer service stories with Bellingham based Softride… Softride Stem Archive | yojimg.net
I was wrong in saying that no Bridgestone ever came equipped with a Softride stem. The 1994 MB-1 had one, per the Sheldon Brown site.

In retrospect, I shouldn't have doubted that there was a Grant Petersen connection, given that the Softride stem was just the sort of quirky yet arguably superior product that he's clearly attracted to.

Adding it to the MB-1 might have been one more nail in the coffin for Bridgestone in the US market, though, since it made the bike that much more expensive as well as less biker-gang-looking compared to a motorcycle fork.

Thanks for the link. Just read the first entry so far and agree that the four pivot points of the Softride stem made it a better choice than the one-pivot Girvin suspension stems.

Plus, I always found the aluminum Softride version to be better-looking, in a slightly goofy Bauhaus/steampunk way.
__________________
You are always the same age inside.---Gertrude Stein

My aluminum bikes: Light, strong, cheap, and comfy.

Last edited by Trakhak; 04-21-26 at 03:00 AM.
Trakhak is offline  
Reply