View Single Post
Old 05-01-06 | 10:02 PM
  #14  
curlybro's Avatar
curlybro
lives in a giant shoe
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: st paul, mn
Originally Posted by Döner kebap
I think CM is exempt from those requirements because it qualifies as a "parade" under this other section of the code:

§ 10-8-330 Parade, public assembly or athletic event.

(1) "Parade" means any march, procession or other similar activity consisting of persons, animals, vehicles or things, or combination thereof, upon any public street, sidewalk, alley or other public place, which requires a street closing or otherwise requires police officers to stop or reroute vehicular traffic because the marchers will not comply with normal and usual traffic regulations or controls.

... [sections ommitted]

(b) No parade or athletic event is permitted on any portion of the public way of the city of Chicago unless a permit allowing such activity has been obtained from the office of emergency management and communications.

... [sections ommitted]

(t) Any person who knowingly interferes with any other person or organization lawfully conducting a parade, public assembly or athletic event or any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance, or any of the provisions of the regulations promulgated hereunder, shall be subject to incarceration for up to 10 days and fined not less than $50.00 nor more than $1,000.00.


Since it seems pretty clear that CM is a "parade," I wonder if you could file a complaint under § 10-8-330(t) against the ******face in the black SUV for disrupting it? It probably wouldn't be too hard to show that he "knowingly interfer[ed] with it."
No he can't be charged with disrupting a parade because it wasn't sanctioned by the city.
curlybro is offline  
Reply