View Single Post
Old 05-19-06 | 01:23 PM
  #19  
John E's Avatar
John E
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,374
Likes: 1,847
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

We all know and have been frustrated by the fact that various cranks seat to different terminal positions on various spindle tapers. What is a reasonable amount of insertion for the spindle? Deeper obviously distributes loads and bending moments much better than shallower, but 100% would prevent proper tightening of the fixing bolt. What is a good percentage?

Also, does anyone know whether Campagnolo has used more than one cutoff width for the spindle taper over the years? I am wondering specifically whether my Veloce cranks, vintage Nervars, and vintage Stronglights are designed for a traditional European taper end, but my Campagnolo cartridge was cut for a typical Shimano application. I have also had concerns about SHIMANO cranks not seating as fully as expected onto a SHIMANO UN-72 cartridge. I would worry about breakage in a crank which seats only halfway down the spindle, but the Veloce is my first experience with actual failure in this area.

I remember reading a recommended torque specification for square-spindle aluminum crank fixing bolts. Does anyone recall what the acceptable range is? I promise I will always use my trusty Husky torque wrench in this application from now on, just as I always use it when I install spark plugs in an aluminum cylinder head.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply