Thread: Toronto Fixed
View Single Post
Old 06-01-06 | 08:26 AM
  #6886  
gboy's Avatar
gboy
accident-prone
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Toronto

Bikes: Brodie Romax Cyclocross

also:

Determinants of fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levelsin transport microenvironments, London, UKH.S. Adams, M.J. Nieuwenhuijsen*, R.N. ColvileImperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, TH Huxley School of Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering,RSM Building, Prince Consort Road, London, SW72BP, UKReceived 1 November 2000; received in revised form 4 March 2001; accepted 15 March 2001

A series of field studies were carried out in London, UK, during 1999–2000 in which over 400 fine particle (PM2.5)personal exposure level measurements were taken for journeys in bicycle, bus, car and underground rail transportmicroenvironments. This was the first comprehensive PM2.5personal exposure study of transport users. Both a fixed-route multi-transport mode study and a study of cyclists’ commuter journeys were undertaken. Subsequent to thesefield studies regression modelling of possible influencing factors of these exposure levels was carried out. Meteorologicalvariables, traffic density, mode and route were considered; the relationships of personal exposure levels with fixed sitemonitor (FSM) concentrations, and of the FSM concentrations with the potential predictor variables, were alsoinvestigated. This analysis of the determinants of transport user exposure to PM2.5in London, UK, showed that windspeed had a significant influence on personal exposure levels, though explained only up to 20% of the variability of roadtransport user exposure levels. The occurrence of higher wind speeds was strongly associated with a decrease in personalexposure levels; a 1.5–2.0 fold difference in exposure level concentrations was estimated between the 10th and 90thpercentiles of wind speed. Route was a significant factor, whilst mode was not a significant factor in the street microenvironment (between bicycle, bus and car modes); models incorporating route and mode, as well as wind speed,explained approximately 35% of the variability in PM2.5exposure levels. Personal exposure levels were reasonably correlated with urban background FSM concentrations, for fixed-route road mode (bicycle, bus and car) exposure level concentrations, r ¼ 0:27 ( p50:01) and for commuter cyclists’ exposure level concentrations r ¼ 0:58 ( p50:01). # 2001Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
What's interesting though are the differences between summer and winter: in the summer, bicyclists are exposed to marginally less than all but bus passengers (with car and subway riders getting slightly higher concentrations); in winter, bicyclists have it significantly worse of all modes.
gboy is offline