I think rankings like Marszalek's are a bit silly even though they are interesting. There are so many ways to define "great". It is so subjective anyway. I mean look at the whole Pro Tour thing and all the problems with that "ranking" system. From Cycle Sport Sept. '05 "no one would dispute McEwens worth to davitamon lotto but that needs to be reflected by the pro tour. after all, which should be recognized as the greater achievement - mcewen's three tour stage wins or hincapie's 15th overall? both were worth 9 points" There are going to be problems with a lot of ranking systems...