Originally Posted by patentcad
Even if Andreu's testimony is true what does it prove? That Armstrong admitted to using banned substances in the privacy of a medical exchange with his doctor? And where does that leave us? With the possibility that at some point (in this case 3-5 years prior to his first Tour de France victory) there were banned substances in his life? In a sport as high minded and clean as European Pro Cycling in the early to mid 1990's? GET OUTTA HERE. No way.
I'm SHOCKED. Round up the usual suspects. Oh wait, Lance passed every doping test he ever took.
Never mind.
I honestly don't care, it's not the cyclists' fault--it's the coaches and the rest of the "infrastructure" that pushes them to perform inhuman feats
I just thought the "Why I'll never buy a Lemond Bicycle" thread was a hoot--Kool-Aid is popular in the summer
regards