Naive......

It's your point of view. Do you have any proof, other than French newspapers putting out story after story, and endless he-said, she-saids? Or some frozen 7 year old urine that your are testing in your basement?

Look the bottom line is maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but in the 15 odd years of racing, he never failed the hundreds, probably thousands, of drug tests, both in and out of season. The ones that "never admitted" to taking drugs, got caught, and failed their tests. So that comparison isn't valid. Plus if they all are doing it, then it's a level playing field, although I can't think that after cancer, going through chemo, and almost dying, that you'd be too keen on putting some kind of drug in your body, with no worries of what may happen to your body if you do. The remission period after cancer makes you even wonder about the water you are drinking, and what it might do, will it make the cancer come back? Although I'm sure some of you probably think that his cancer and treaments where some trumped up story that never happened right.

I just always enjoy how the Lance haters think that he is so evil and dishonest, and all his accusers are pure and truthful, with absolutley no hidden agendas, or looking for some kind of payout. It goes both ways.

He won 7 tours, and the euros and especially the French hate that, so why didn't they put up a "doped up" rider in all those years that could at least win 1?? Besides, they all rode much better bikes, since Treks are such garbage, so they should have at least had an eqiupment advantage right???

Let it go....