Old 07-07-06, 08:42 PM
  #7  
savage24
Senior Member
 
savage24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 205

Bikes: Performance mountain bike, Giant Cypress LX hybrid, Surly Long Haul Trucker

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nova
well i consider any trail to road intersection a trail head.

And i doubt they take mup trafic in to consideration. But regardess my idea is still valid and they should put lights on these. Not every intersection needs to have high trafic to need a light. Danger level also dictates the need.
Hey, that sounds great. Where's your checkbook??
I think you have a fine idea if it was dangerous to cross the road even after coming to a stop and looking for traffic due to a sharp curve or hill, but those situations are very rare. The collision on the bike trail above was the result of the cyclist not following the rules of the trail, specifically, to stop and look for traffic at road crossings. The cyclist should be ticketed for failure to yield.
When an irresponsable cager hurts or kills a cyclist, we scream for justice. When an irresponsable cyclist hurts or kills themselves we want stop lights for the cagers - give me a break!
savage24 is offline