Originally Posted by Keith99
The latest denial from Floyd seems to say his levels were high.
Where are all these sources saying his levels were not high?
You can go the the MSN page and see reports implying the levels are high. I've seen nothing except arguments from silence to imply that they are not high. (Other than on this board).
ESPN's cycling expert, for one. And at least the Wall St Journal article stressed the test was a ratio (Floyd tested at 11-to-1, the threshold is 4-to-1).
EVERY other media report has it wrong, IMO - ASSUMING a "high ratio" automatically means high testosterone, instead of the other option of super-low epitestosterone.