View Single Post
Old 08-19-06 | 02:01 PM
  #12  
moxfyre's Avatar
moxfyre
cyclist/gearhead/cycli...
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 1
From: DC / Maryland suburbs

Bikes: Homebuilt tourer/commuter, modified-beyond-recognition 1990 Trek 1100, reasonably stock 2002-ish Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo

Originally Posted by highlyselassie
Significantly reduced efficiency?. Maybe if you cleaned your derailleur chain everyday, it would hold some truth, but significantly is a rather significant word.

Also, how expensive is a Sturmey AW?

You have some points, but don't blow them out of proportion.
Read the book "Bicycling Science" (really great book by the way!!!) for some hard data on chain drive efficiency with various setups. Long story short, a dirt-drive derailer-geared system with a clean chain is about 98-99% efficient with a cog of 15T or larger. An internally-geared system is around 5-20% less efficient in non-direct drive, depending on its construction. And chain cleanliness is fairly irrelevant, since it will affect derailer- or internally-geared bikes nearly equally, given that they both use a chain going from a chainring to a cog.

Internally geared hubs are quite expensive: today's equivalent of the 3-speed Sturmey-Archer would probably be the 7-speed Shimano Nexus hub, which I couldn't find for < $150. By contrast, I can get a pair of Shimano LX or Shimano 105 derailers, rear hub, and a 9-speed cassette for about $100 from Nashbar. The LX setup will have a slightly wider and more finely spaced gear range, and is quite a bit lighter. The difference *may* be due to economies of scale in large part, but I'm not sure...
moxfyre is offline  
Reply