Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Interesting?
There should be nothing interesting or surprising about the assertion that some traffic regulations are of no relevance to some motorists.
Of course, the assertion that all traffic regulations are of no relevance to motorists would be patently absurd.
Any traffic regulation that applies to a motorist is, by definition, of relevance to that motorist. And likewise, any traffic regulation that does not apply to that motorist, and does not otherwise affect that motorist, is by definition, of no relevance to that motorist.
Because bike lane regulations apply to motorists, they are of relevance to motorists.
To assert that relevance to the motorist is based on what the motorist is personally interested in is patently absurd.