Originally Posted by genec
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Rando, are you contending that bike lanes are perfectly safe and pose no dangers?
Even I wouldn't contend that...
I know you wouldn't contend that. You would say...
Originally Posted by genec
Bike lanes are ... frought with potential harm, ...
But Rando said:
Originally Posted by rando
If the LCI is [pointing out the dangers of bike lanes], ...they shouldn't be teaching.
Thus rando, as far as I can tell, is contending that bike lanes pose no dangers. Otherwise, what would be wrong with pointing out those dangers (which "even you" admit are "frought with potential harm")?
Originally Posted by rando
thank you, genec.
Are you agreeing with Gene, that bike lanes are "frought with potential harm", yet still contend that LCIs who point out those dangers should not be teaching?
I'm sorry, but I can't make any sense out of your position.