View Single Post
Old 09-26-06 | 09:03 AM
  #44  
Air's Avatar
Air
Destroyer of Wheels
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 7
From: Creating some FA-Qs

Bikes: Surly LHT, Dahon folding bike. RIP Nishiki Sport, Downtube IXNS, 1950's MMB3 Russian Folding Bike, MTB

Originally Posted by Lucky07
I suspect the fact that cars bring in revenue for the city (parking, tickets, meters, tolls, etc.). Bikes don't bring in that kind of money. That will always be a factor in city planning.
Consider that people riding bikes means that:

Less people in cabs
Less people on subways & buses (I've used $4 in public transportation over the last few months vs between $10 and $20 per week)
Less cars for tolls, meters, taxes money from car services (garages/gas), TOWING, and tickets.

Technically a car free city would bankrupt them!

Yes, slightly tongue in cheek but certainly a consideration. Trans Alt is pushing for a London type high traffic toll where if you ride in the city during peak times you'd be charged something like $10 a day to encourage less traffic and more revenue, no peak free street parking with higher meters to encourage less people parking (so quicker wait times to find a spot).

City also kicks around the idea of a bicycle registration you'd have to pay every year like a car.
__________________
The Almighty Clyde FAQ || Northeast Index
eTrex Vista References || Road Reference


It's the year of the enema!
Air is offline  
Reply