View Single Post
Old 10-25-06, 01:17 PM
  #21  
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by brianappleby
why can't HR be a (relatively) accurate indicator of effort?

I was thinkng about this yesterday during a low intensity ride...

I can hold:

160bpm and 260 watts at 85 rpm
or:
160bpm and 220 watts at 100 rpm

of course i could just pedal a bit harder at 100 rpm and bring the power back up, but then my HR would increase, so if i were wanting to go faster, shouldn't I just pedal harder and increase the HR at 85rpm?

So can someone please explain why 85rpm wouldn't be my ideal cadence period, and that anyone with access to a powertap couldn't do the same for themselves?
That's because HR is only measuring your heart/lungs. There's also your muscles, which has a different indicator. It's like comparing the tachometer vs. the speedometer in a car.

The "ideal" cadence comes down to your personal physique and power-output. In general the higher the power-output needed, the higher the RPM. Try putting out 400w for a while at two difference cadences and note how your legs feel as well.
DannoXYZ is offline