Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

WADA considering banning altitude tents

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

WADA considering banning altitude tents

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-06, 06:16 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
WADA considering banning altitude tents

WADA considering banning altitude tents
Cyclingnews 12/4/06
By Jeff Jones

https://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?...y06/may12news2

The World Anti-Doping Agency is considering banning altitude tents, devices used by athletes that create hypoxic (low oxygen) conditions in order to stimulate the production of more red blood cells. Such devices are "probably contrary to the spirit of the sport," according to WADA's ethics committee, and they will be one of the subjects of discussion at WADA's upcoming meeting on May 13-14 in Montreal.

In a pre-meeting briefing, WADA president Dick Pound said, "We have an interesting discussion forthcoming with respect to the whole issue of hypoxic chambers and the whole concept of artificially induced hypoxic conditions. This has been an issue that has gone back and forth in the sports community and the business community for a number of years.

"Our medical authorities agree that the creation of these conditions can be performance enhancing. Our ethics and education committee has concluded that the use of these devices is probably contrary to the spirit of sport, and it will be up to the executive committee to decide how it wants to proceed with it.

"If the executive committee wants to get further input on it, I think one of the possibilities will be to add this to the draft list that will be circulated with respect to 2007. As you know, that is a list that is widely circulated for consultation, reaction and response to something in excess of 1500 stakeholders and others involved in laboratory work and so forth, so we'll get additional input on that before deciding definitively in September whether or not it goes onto the list."

Currently, many of the top professional cyclists use altitude tents, which up until now have always been legal. Training and living at altitude is also legal, and presumably will remain so. But if WADA does decide to ban hypoxic tents, then it will have to consider the issue of enforcing the ban. Bedroom raids or an honesty system, anyone?
classic1 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 06:18 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I hear that eating food and drinking water are performance enhancing. I wonder what position WADA takes on these performance enhancing practices.

Tools
classic1 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 06:19 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 517
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think they are illegal in Italy,didnt someone get busted at last years giro?
dolophonic is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 06:24 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
All's I know is that having sex in a hypoxic tent is really exhausting.

--Steve
zimbo is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 07:11 AM
  #5  
Stop it.
 
56/12 and 22/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Weight Weenie-land.
Posts: 1,607

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Hardrock Pro w/ slicks, flipped stem and HB, 2003 Colnago Dream with full Dura-Ace 7700 double, 2001 Bianchi XL Boron/Daytona, Mavic Open Pro/Campy Centaur/DT Champion built wheels.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What about the Helium tents?

What are they going to do about those?
56/12 and 22/28 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 07:18 AM
  #6  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Hypoxia can lead to new dangerous blood vessel growth and promote tumour growth at the level done in these tents.
WADA is just trying to level the playing field and make racing safer. If left up to the riders, they would enhance to the point of health detriment later in life, this was done in the 50-60s with sad results.

Helium tents are hypoxic tents.

Last edited by DocRay; 05-12-06 at 07:24 AM.
 
Old 05-12-06, 08:36 AM
  #7  
Now Racer Ex
 
Vinokurtov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I hear they are going to ban training at altitude next. All the riders will have to wear GPS tracking braclets and the minute they hit 100 feet above sea level...
Vinokurtov is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 08:39 AM
  #8  
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Posts: 5,182

Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likely, pro cyclists, like world class runners, will move to high altitude. It makes training less convenient, because it's easier to "live high, train low" (to an extent) with the chamber, but they'd probably get better results actually living high and training low then sleeping "high" and living "low":

https://physiotherapy.curtin.edu.au/r...s/00/cheuk.cfm
NoRacer is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 08:42 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Every racer that spends more then 3 months at altitude a year (6K+ft) will have a handicap on race day. Miles of the stage (M) * months greater then 3 at altitude (A) * .03 (the percent gain they MIGHT have because of extra red blood cells). All pro team riders will have a GPS tracking chip implanted. In addition to calculating time at altitude this chip will be used to track all substances ingested or administered to the athletes, oh and to measure how often they have sex. (The WADA guys need more to micro-manage)
teamawe is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 08:43 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Vino and I thought the same thing, I just took longer to type. /grin
teamawe is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 08:49 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Plus, all pro riders will have to have their body waste tested daily by WADA. Funnily enough, no rider is complaining about having to send their poo to Dick Pound. Lance Armstrong is so excited by this prospect he is considering a comeback.
classic1 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:08 AM
  #12  
Globo Gym lifetime member
 
Cypress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204

Bikes: Fast ones

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by classic1
president Dick Pound

LOL.


Banning the tents would be rediculous. How would they control that sort of thing anyways?
__________________
Cypress is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:22 AM
  #13  
I'm fine.
 
Cromulent's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,263

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sport, IRO Rob Roy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WADA should just ban training altogether. Or having two legs. Having two legs gives some riders an advantage. Any rider considered a GC contender in any grand tour should have one leg removed. That'll show those 'winners'.

Idiots.
Cromulent is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:24 AM
  #14  
Now Racer Ex
 
Vinokurtov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cypress
LOL.


Banning the tents would be rediculous. How would they control that sort of thing anyways?
Pound, Dick will do the vulcan mind meld with every rider. Or he will look into his crystal balls.
Vinokurtov is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:40 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Pound wouldn't want to clang those crystal balls together. They might shatter and cut Dick.
classic1 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:44 AM
  #16  
Globo Gym lifetime member
 
Cypress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204

Bikes: Fast ones

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinokurtov
Pound, Dick will do the vulcan mind meld with every rider. Or he will look into his crystal balls.

I should get rid of my tent.


Wouldn't want to rub Dick the wrong way.
__________________
Cypress is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 09:52 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Dick would be stiff if he didn't pass these rules. How will Dick penetrate the hole..um whole of the issues spreadeagled before him? Will Dick pull it off?
classic1 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 11:59 AM
  #18  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Cypress
LOL.
It's still not as funny as (GW)Bush and Dick (Cheney).
 
Old 05-12-06, 12:17 PM
  #19  
Globo Gym lifetime member
 
Cypress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 5,204

Bikes: Fast ones

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 410 Post(s)
Liked 614 Times in 306 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
It's still not as funny as (GW)Bush and Dick (Cheney).

Personally I think Bush get's in Dick's way. But then, Bush couldn't do anything to prevent Dick from shooting someone in the face.
__________________
Cypress is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 12:28 PM
  #20  
You know you want to.
 
Eatadonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,894

Bikes: Pinarello Prince, 1980's 531 steel fixie commuter, FrankenMTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NoRacer
Likely, pro cyclists, like world class runners, will move to high altitude.
Exactly. This is ridiculous, and will just lead to richer teams traveling more, and poorer teams losing, and getting poorer.
__________________
Weather today: Hot. Humid. Potholes.
Eatadonut is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 01:57 PM
  #21  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
But low 02 tents are lower than high altitude 02 levels. that's the point, it's dangerous.

WADA has authority to drug test any rider, at any time and enter and search his house. WADA entered and searched Sheryl Crowe's place in Manhattan and demanded a sample from Armstrong on the spot last June.
 
Old 05-12-06, 02:42 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Snicklefritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DocRay
Hypoxia can lead to new dangerous blood vessel growth and promote tumour growth at the level done in these tents.
WADA is just trying to level the playing field and make racing safer. If left up to the riders, they would enhance to the point of health detriment later in life, this was done in the 50-60s with sad results.

Helium tents are hypoxic tents.
What was done in the 50-60's? are you talking about trying hypoxic tents? Or some other "performance enhancing" thing?
Snicklefritz is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 02:44 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Snicklefritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They should ban sport drinks and Gu next. I heard those enhance performance too.
Snicklefritz is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 02:51 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Eatadonut
Exactly. This is ridiculous, and will just lead to richer teams traveling more, and poorer teams losing, and getting poorer.
Yes, rather than leveling the playing field this tilts it farther still.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 05-12-06, 05:51 PM
  #25  
The Kaiser
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Issaquah WA
Posts: 173

Bikes: K2 Mach 2.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aren't bikes performance enhancing? They should just chop off their legs and let them try and crawl through the stages. The sprint would be hilarious
alpe d'issaquah is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.