Originally Posted by DrWJODonnell
(Post 6720002)
I have wondered about it, particularly with a select few really strong riders around here. But as to the prevalence? I don't think anyone in the know would tell, and those who are not can only speculate.
Here is a question for you guys though. If USAC/UCI said that EPO starting tomorrow would be perfectly legal, would you use it? |
How much does it cost for a doping test? $500-1000?
An interesting system would be to allow racers in a region to "vote" for someone in any category that they want tested by putting up $10-20 (or more if they really feel strongly about the matter). When they hit $1000 in "donations" for a particular suspicious rider, that rider gets a surprise test. |
Originally Posted by The_Cretin
(Post 6721034)
How much does it cost for a doping test? $500-1000?
An interesting system would be to allow racers in a region to "vote" for someone in any category that they want tested by putting up $10-20 (or more if they really feel strongly about the matter). When they hit $1000 in "donations" for a particular suspicious rider, that rider gets a surprise test. |
I don't care what you "clean" racers say: I'm not giving up the Oreos.
|
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
(Post 6720152)
Doc/Nomad,
I appreciate both of your contributions to the board in general, but come on you're not seriously going to draw a parallel between use of PEDs and Zipps are you? If there were a healthy, legal, and affordable PROVEN PED that doesn't get me sent to a court martial, you bet I'd use it. But of course, so would everyone else. If I could remember to, like taking vitamins - which I can't remember to do either. |
Originally Posted by waterrockets
(Post 6721169)
I don't care what you "clean" racers say: I'm not giving up the Oreos.
|
Originally Posted by waterrockets
(Post 6721169)
I don't care what you "clean" racers say: I'm not giving up the Oreos.
God sent you a supply to last you a good while. |
:roflmao: ElJamoquio
Originally Posted by substructure
(Post 6721427)
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1
God sent you a supply to last you a good while. So sad they're probably going to toss them all. You know what the street value of a haul like that is worth around here? |
Originally Posted by NomadVW
(Post 6721305)
If you're talking about gaining an "unfair" advantage, then yes. If they're legal - they're fair. The question then comes down to health. They're banned because someone thinks they'll be (or have been) done in excess/improperly and subsequently be hazardous to health. They're not banned because of unfair advantage.
If there were a healthy, legal, and affordable PROVEN PED that doesn't get me sent to a court martial, you bet I'd use it. But of course, so would everyone else. If I could remember to, like taking vitamins - which I can't remember to do either. PEDs are available to anyone willing and able to shell out the cash as well. The difference is there is one must also pay the piper. Use of test, EPO or HGH has health repercussions. Therefore, athletes that are willing to sacrifice their health for performance are given an unfair advantage. Is a poor racer who shows up at a TT with a standard road bike in normal kit at a disadvantage to a wealthy racer of similar abilities who is in full TT regalia? Of course. The difference is obviously that the poorer racer doesn't have to put his life on the line to be competitive with the wealthier one. He just needs to borrow good stuff, get on a good team, or get a better job... Drugs =! Zipps |
Oreos are like a drug. Double Stuff Oreos are like 100% pure heroin.
http://content.answers.com/main/cont...kie_Friday.PNG Where the F is Chipcom when you need him? |
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 6721523)
Oreos are like a drug. Double Stuff Oreos are like 100% pure heroin.
http://content.answers.com/main/cont...kie_Friday.PNG Where the F is Chipcom when you need him? i prefer nutter butters and ginger snaps, but can't find either over here, so it's beer and peanuts instead. |
You guys are all wrong. It's Oatmeal Raisin.
|
Originally Posted by substructure
(Post 6721074)
EPO has a very short half life. If the rider in question catches wind, he's off and clean before the test is given.
|
Originally Posted by ElJamoquio
(Post 6721553)
You guys are all wrong. It's Oatmeal Raisin.
actually the only decent cookie you can get here is stroopwafels. http://www.atouchofdutch.com/images/12299.jpg |
If Double Stuf is like 100% pure heroin, then Chocolate Creme Double Stuf is like 100% pure heroin administered by Roller Girl:
http://www.x-entertainment.com/articles/0819/6.jpg |
Speaking of Oreos... now we need a milk truck to jack knife next to it.
|
Speaking of milk, you guys aren't going to make me post the pic of Roller Girl are you?
|
|
Originally Posted by waterrockets
(Post 6721720)
Speaking of milk, you guys aren't going to make me post the pic of Roller Girl are you?
You can tell we're all starving ourselves like coked-up models here. Some of these threads swerve toward food. |
Originally Posted by waterrockets
(Post 6721720)
Speaking of milk, you guys aren't going to make me post the pic of Roller Girl are you?
http://www.umbrellagirlsusa.com/Phot.../images/38.jpg |
I just creamed myself! :eek: :twitchy:
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...te-covered.jpg |
Originally Posted by botto
(Post 6721822)
I need to go change. |
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus
(Post 6721516)
I'd argue they are banned in large part because they impart an unfair advantage. Bike tech is available to anyone willing and able to shell out the cash.
PEDs are available to anyone willing and able to shell out the cash as well. The difference is there is one must also pay the piper. Use of test, EPO or HGH has health repercussions. Therefore, athletes that are willing to sacrifice their health for performance are given an unfair advantage. Is a poor racer who shows up at a TT with a standard road bike in normal kit at a disadvantage to a wealthy racer of similar abilities who is in full TT regalia? Of course. The difference is obviously that the poorer racer doesn't have to put his life on the line to be competitive with the wealthier one. He just needs to borrow good stuff, get on a good team, or get a better job... Drugs =! Zipps Edit: should add that getting to be TT schwagdizzle hurts only your bank account. |
Originally Posted by The_Cretin
(Post 6721034)
How much does it cost for a doping test? $500-1000?
An interesting system would be to allow racers in a region to "vote" for someone in any category that they want tested by putting up $10-20 (or more if they really feel strongly about the matter). When they hit $1000 in "donations" for a particular suspicious rider, that rider gets a surprise test. |
that's a remarkably unworkable idea.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.