![]() |
Originally Posted by tetonrider
(Post 18297886)
i don't own them, but i read about them here.
this comment from someone who has been using them a while was interesting (or scary, depending on your POV): http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=486457 curious for what you find, esp as the author of that site tends to do testing that focuses more on what triathletes want vs competitive cyclists (e.g., he seems to care mainly about average power over longer durations and not response to changes in power and cadence over shorter durations based on reading years of his reviews). that he is noting the settling issue is, well, noteworthy for that reason. |
Originally Posted by tetonrider
(Post 18297888)
post up when you have some time with it.
there's another monitor that does non-invasive measurements of lactate; the variance has shown to be quite substantial based on where it is placed. While I'm sure you know the difference between the terms accuracy and precision, it is mostly precision I care about. The accuracy part is just useful for posting to forums or trying to convince USAC coaches you can ride. I'd take a race result over a number from any device any day. |
Oh yeah, I value precision over accuracy too. I like to know the number to the hundred-thousandth even if it's 10% off.
wat. |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 18297956)
The Moxy is the other one I learned about here. As this just goes in one place I'll never know the numbers it gives attached to the arm or head.
While I'm sure you know the difference between the terms accuracy and precision, it is mostly precision I care about. The accuracy part is just useful for posting to forums or trying to convince USAC coaches you can ride. I'd take a race result over a number from any device any day. if you're using that tool for MLSS it could be interesting, but i'm guessing given the fact that you have schools evaluating your boy based on -- in theory -- actual lactate values (they do blood tests, right?), you maybe should care about accuracy in addition to precision. ymmv. |
No - evaluations are based on erg times - Concept 2. Just like in cycling selection is based on ITT times. For soccer GKs it is saves.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select. It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve. |
Originally Posted by Dunbar
(Post 18292924)
Can anyone suggest a decent cycling vest that works down to ~50 degrees? I'm hoping for something with a race fit so it doesn't flap in the wind.
|
I'm 6'3". my windvests don't flap. buy small!
|
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 18298321)
No - evaluations are based on erg times - Concept 2. Just like in cycling selection is based on ITT times. For soccer GKs it is saves.
Just the way it is they select on numbers, not wins. I don't think it is correct to select that way, but that pretty much is how they select. It is easier for coaches that don't know what they are trying to achieve. assumed that meant that BL was something coaches at least look at, and if they are looking at it, that means you want to look at it as well. but if they're looking at different numbers than you are......well, there's your 'accuracy matters' bit. |
I did. He was talking how the Russians were selecting and his numbers. No college I know of (I don't know that many and there are only a few for lightweight) does that for selection.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree. It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull. |
Is the Castelli Body Paint skinsuit pretty much the best on the block for aero-ness? Pre-prepping for 2016 and looking to save watts.
|
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 18299443)
Is the Castelli Body Paint skinsuit pretty much the best on the block for aero-ness? Pre-prepping for 2016 and looking to save watts.
i'd probably guess that specialized clothing will be making bigger waves in 2016 too |
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 18299443)
Is the Castelli Body Paint skinsuit pretty much the best on the block for aero-ness? Pre-prepping for 2016 and looking to save watts.
Originally Posted by jdms mvp
(Post 18299452)
probably bio racer or drag2zero (simon smart)
i'd probably guess that specialized clothing will be making bigger waves in 2016 too |
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 18299443)
Is the Castelli Body Paint skinsuit pretty much the best on the block for aero-ness? Pre-prepping for 2016 and looking to save watts.
|
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 18299290)
I did. He was talking how the Russians were selecting and his numbers. No college I know of (I don't know that many and there are only a few for lightweight) does that for selection.
I'm sure if junior has a good number I'll let him know, as I let him know about VO2 max and cycling power. They all cross to a degree. It is all erg and to some degree winning in a boat with a team - OR single skull winning, but most juniors do not single skull. Not sure why I mixed them up in the earlier post, but I knew you said that guy was measuring blood lactate concentration, and for some reason (brain fart!) i forgot Moxy, et. al. are measuring SmO2. Especially dumb as I've played with Moxy a bit. Again, I don't know why I had my head stuck in non-invasive blood lactate measurements (which I've heard discussed) w/r/t those devices, and I clearly confused that with what you mentioned about that one coach's conversation with blood lactate measurements during a vo2max rowing test. Sorry! |
NP. I'm not finding the setup all so easy as I don't Android or iOS. Still seeming the Lactate measure tells the story that HR and power do not. If it works it is the definitive number on how hard and how much an athlete can take. I can't see why having a power number would trump a Lactate number - for telling the athlete what to do.
|
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 18300771)
New sponsor. Kids are pretty excited. Should have kits early 2016.
|
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 18304454)
NP. I'm not finding the setup all so easy as I don't Android or iOS. Still seeming the Lactate measure tells the story that HR and power do not. If it works it is the definitive number on how hard and how much an athlete can take. I can't see why having a power number would trump a Lactate number - for telling the athlete what to do.
|
V2
|
Originally Posted by mike868y
(Post 18304719)
havent tried the body paint skin suit but I'm not overly impressed with our teams custom castelli stuff tbh.
I didn't get my hands on them yet and we should have an assortment of their stuff so I'll do pictures when I get them. |
san remo is pretty sweet (is the skinsuit in my hillclimb pics) and has pockets enough for any race.
|
Originally Posted by mike868y
(Post 18304719)
havent tried the body paint skin suit but I'm not overly impressed with our teams custom castelli stuff tbh.
|
Originally Posted by grolby
(Post 18305551)
That's cause we're buying the cheap stuff. If we can get enough people to meet the minimums on the San Remo, or even on the Aero Race stuff (bibs/jersey), that stuff is great if a bit delicate. I still think what you get for the price from Giordana is better, but Castelli is fine. I actually really like everything except the Team jersey, which feels very last-decade. The plus side is that durability for the Team jersey and bibs are superb, they really last. I've also been happy with the cyclocross skinsuits, for what it's worth.
my favorite custom kit mfgr by far is craft. |
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 18299443)
Is the Castelli Body Paint skinsuit pretty much the best on the block for aero-ness? Pre-prepping for 2016 and looking to save watts.
Many of the "fast" skin suits, such as Castelli, are not very durable - big depends. So be prepared to have seams rip that require repair with a special sewing machine or they are good for a couple of races. My wife, who set a UCI world record this year on the track, rode in a Champion carbon skin suit with the zipper on the back. If fit really well and seems durable. Most clothing manufacturers do not understand that women are not small men. Whatever you get, the fit should be amazingly tight and hence, the likelihood to damage it when putting it on and taking it off. http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u...pszzyhnedy.jpg |
my bodypaint skinsuit is so tight I bring a backup skinsuit in case it rips when I'm putting it on.
|
Originally Posted by Ygduf
(Post 18305760)
my bodypaint skinsuit is so tight I bring a backup skinsuit in case it rips when I'm putting it on.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.