Originally Posted by kjmillig
For what it's worth, in Texas they were just plain breaking the law. State law requires a headlight visible from 500 feet, and either a reflector visible from 300 feet or rear light visible from 500 feet. And as usual, you get yelled at for something they did wrong. How many times has that happened to all of us!

They are also breaking the law in Ontario, Canada (where this happened), where lights are required on bicycles at night, where the highway traffic act states:
Motor assisted bicycles, bicycles and tricycles, lights on, etc.
(17) When on a highway at any time from one-half hour before sunset to one-half hour after sunrise and at any other time when, due to insufficient light or unfavourable atmospheric conditions, persons and vehicles on the highway are not clearly discernible at a distance of 150 metres or less, every motor assisted bicycle, bicycle or tricycle shall carry on the front thereof a lighted lamp displaying a white or amber light and on the rear thereof a lighted lamp displaying a red light or a reflector approved by the Ministry, and in addition there shall be placed on the front forks thereof white reflective material, and on the rear thereof red reflective material covering a surface of not less than 250 millimetres in length and 25 millimetres in width. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 62 (17).
The problem with this law comes in subsection 18:
Penalty
(18) Every person who contravenes subsection (17) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $20. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 62 (18).
I would like to see the law changed to state that the light must be visible for 150m (500'), and the fine increased to at least $100, preferably $200. The fine for not having a bell is $100, and most bells sell for less then $10, so most people do not want to take the chance, but even a reasonably cheap light is more then $20.