Old 12-06-06, 10:32 AM
  #39  
Grasschopper
He drop me
 
Grasschopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central PA
Posts: 11,664

Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 138 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by DrPete
Actually, I looked at Klein's website and reviewed my Pinarello's geometry, and compared my 57cm traditional with their 58cm compact.

-Top tube length was identical.
-Seat tube angle was 72.5 for the Pinarello, 73.5 for the Klein.
-Chainstay for the Pinarello is 40.9cm, Klein's is 42.4.
-Fork rake for the Pinarello is 43mm, Klein's is 48.
-I couldn't find a head tube length for the Pinarello, but looking at how the frames are measured they seem comparable.

So, in my little bit of experience, this says to me that you get shorter stays and less fork rake, i.e. quicker handling, but as far as top tube length and other fit-related things the frames are pretty similar.

Hip, can you measure the head tube on your Klein and tell me what size it is? That would close the loop...
That shorter wheelbase also means the ride quality will be harsher.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
Grasschopper is offline