Originally Posted by bassplayinbiker
Well, if you want to get another set of Mr. tuffies I would go for it.
I don't think you understood my point. I am not particularly in the mood to get another set of Mr. Tuffys after this experience, combined with the fact that I've done pretty well without them.
Essentially, I am fishing about here to see if anyone with experience with the Tuffys has a convincing argument that may change my opinion on the subject - before I simply rip out the Tuffy, and install the tube 'bare' in the tyre, the way I've been doing it for the last 2 years.
Originally Posted by bassplayinbiker
It also sounds like time for a new (better) set of tyres. I like the michelin Pro-races myself.
Not when one is aiming for a vintage tread & skin sidewall appearance. I don't mind the cheaper skinwall tyres, I can live very well with the minute loss of performance on most of these machines. When I want optimum performance, I hop onto my 1983 Peugeot PSV-10, outfitted with FSA RD-80s, Specialized Mondia 23Cs, and an early '90s Shimano 600 STI group.
Originally Posted by Sci-Fi
Personally, I use kevlar belted tires and just deal with the extra weight of thorn resistant tubes. At least for me, it's the best compromise for the conditions on my commute...others may want or need extra flat protection, whether it be tire liners and/or tire sealant with flat resistant tires like armadillo or...
That's another thing I've been trying to figure out. How in hell does a different bead material (Kevlar VS wired) improve tyre puncture resistance?
Originally Posted by toolboy
Hate the things!
Pretty much answers my question in the first place
. Seriously though, I would like to solicit a few more opinions before I mount the tubes once again.
-Kurt