Originally Posted by Bikepacker67
What really pisses me off about Julia Rietz's logic is that she said there was no expectation of a cyclist on the side of the road.
WTF? A public road, and you don't have the expectation that a cyclist (a legal VEHICLE) might be there?
I still think she's an idiot.
What if a car had a flat tire and was pulled off on the side of the road and she ran into it and killed the person chaing the tire? Would Rietz still say that there was no expectation that a car should be on the side of the road?
As you said, she is an idiot