Originally Posted by The Octopus
I recall hearing that the route and distance rules are a bit arcane -- something along the lines of, you only get credit for the shortest distance between controles, not for the distance of the route you actually take between controles. Can someone confirm or deny? If that's accurate, that means your route, to be a "good one" -- i.e., efficient -- will run in a fairly straight line (or be an out-and-back) and will have more controles than you're used to in a brevet. In my neck of the woods, it also means a lot of good back roads are effectively off limits, as the rules reward taking state and US highways that tend not to meander from point to point (like us cyclists like to do!).
You only get credit for the shortest distance (on paved roads, not as the crow flies) between controls on ALL brevets! I've designed routes, and that is one of the qualifications. You cannot have "shortcuts" available to the riders, and if there is a possible shortcut, you've got to have a stratigically placed control to prevent any possibility of using the shortcut. Yes, it makes planning a bit more difficult and time consuming, but it is do-able.
The RUSA brevet rules:
http://www.rusa.org/orgreg.html