Originally Posted by lewisbmo
Hello, I'm new here and new to cycling. I have a wal-mart special right now but intend on upgrading this spring. I ride on rail to trail, some city riding and I live in the country on a gravel road, which I ride on quite a bit. I ride around 50 miles per week. In layman's terms, what is the difference in the trek 7300 at $469.00; the trek 7500 at $659.00 And The Trek 7700 at 1259.00? Just wondering if the higher priced bikes are really worth it. thanks...Lewis b.
Usually the higher price buys you a lighter (and sometimes stronger) frame along with an upgrade in durability and finish on the components (also lighter). Also add in a stronger and lighter wheelset. All of it adds up to ride quality which is a subjective thing.
Personally I'd invest my money in a great frame and wheelset before I put it into componentry. You can hang the best components on a cheap frame and it will still feel like a cheap bike. Same with the wheels; put a set of cheap steel wheels on a Merlin and feel how bad a $2500 titanium frame rides. Does it really matter if you use a 105 derailleur or a DuraAce derailleur? I have both and they both work great but the 105 cost $20.00 and the DuraAce was $50.00.
The higher prices bikes are worth it if you enjoy it and will ride the heck out of it because it will probably last longer and need to have less parts replaced ultimately. Gives you less excuses too.