View Single Post
Old 02-21-07 | 06:55 PM
  #45  
rando's Avatar
rando
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,968
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, AZ
"American cycling opinion is reduced to having a single source: a fear of motor traffic from behind. There is no other consideration for the rest of the article for what American cycling opinion (whatever the heck that really is) actually might be.

Dot #2
Quote:Is fear of motor traffic from behind a "persistent fear of a circumscribed stimulus?" Yes, it is. The victim fears a specific situation, motor traffic from behind while riding a bicycle.

Now these poor souls are victims of an illness.


Dot #3
Quoteoes exposure to motor traffic from behind, while riding a bicycle, almost invariably provoke an immediate anxiety response. Certainly it does, and even contemplating the exposure of others to the stimulus causes anxiety response, as when people organize political committees to obtain protection from the condition that they fear.

Basically here he is saying that bicycle advocates, the victims above, are just sick phobics and their advocacy is just an anxiety response."



Hey man, I'm not afraid of just traffic from behind. I'm afraid of dying because some jerk isn't paying attention. front, side, back, wherever. I use less-travelled roads to increase my chances of not getting smushed. you think I'm phobic, so what. I do what I feel is right for my personal safety. I like riding but I am not dying for it.
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen

Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
rando is offline